Authors: Patterson, Emily S.; Wears, Robert L.
Source: Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, Volume 36, Number 2, February 2010 , pp. 52-61(10)
Publisher: Joint Commission Resources
Background: Numerous quality improvement projects on patient handoffs have been conducted, yet standardized, reliable measurement tools remain elusive.
Handoff Quality Measures Classified by Primary Handoff Purpose: The literature review, which yielded approximately 400 relevant articles, led to the identification of seven primary functions for patient handoffs, each of which implies different interventions to improve them: (1) Framing 1, information processing is the most prevalent in the patient handoff literature; (2) Framing 2, stereotypical narratives, emphasizes highlighting deviations from typical narratives, such as a patient who is allergic to the preferred antibiotic for treating his or her diagnosed condition; (3) Framing 3, resilience, takes advantage of the transparency of the thought processes revealed through the conversation to identify erroneous assumptions and actions; (4) Framing 4, accountability, emphasizes the transfer of responsibility and authority; (5) Framing 5, social interaction, considers the perspective of the participants in the exchange; (6) Framing 6, distributed cognition, addresses how a transfer to a new care provider affects a network of specialized practitioners performing dedicated roles who may or may not be transitioning at the same time; (7) Framing 7, cultural norms, relates to how group values (instantiated as social norms for acceptable behavior) in an organization or suborganization are negotiated and maintained over time.
Discussion: The diversity of handoff measurement approaches suggests a lack of consensus about the primary purpose of a handoff, as well as about what interventions are most promising for improving handoff processes. Recognizing that there are simultaneously multiple purposes for handoffs is a critical precursor to quality improvement.
Document Type: Research article
Publication date: 20010-02-01
For more informative articles like this one, subscribe to The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety.